光谱成像技术研究室知识库

This paper uses traditional algorithms and deep learning algorithms to recover datacube obtained by CASSI and CSIMS in order to verify that CSIMS outperforms CASSI by comparing the Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity (SSIM) and Relative spectral Quadratic Error (RQE) of the reconstructed datacube. The experimental results show that the datacube of CASSI and CSIMS can be both reconstructed by ADMM-TV algorithm which is the most effective among the traditional algorithms. PSNR of the reconstructed datacube of CASSI is 32.50 dB, while that of CSIMS is 35.53 dB, with an increase of 3.03 dB. By using deep learning algorithm, both systems improve substantially under the PnP-HSI network, with PSNR of CASSI growing to 38.85 dB and that of CSIMS growing to 41.97 dB, which can be seen that CSIMS is still 3.12 dB higher than CASSI. © COPYRIGHT SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.